|
|
|
|
|
 |
-SubZero-
I EATCHOO
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1700
TMK Koins: 2147064767
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:45 am
Post subject: |
 |
| |
| Scorpion53 wrote: | | You still cannot forget that Ermac is a servant of Shao Kahn, or his clone, so to speak for all you gamecube players. Ermac did attack Ashrah, as if he were under Kahn's control. And on the subject of Kang, the guy could not have been controlled by Tsung and Quan Chi because they were involved in a fire fight with Raiden, between themselves, and then all against Onaga. Who could have possibly controlled him besides Onaga? He did control many of the evil things that took place in some of the realms. |
Ermac was released from Kahn's control by Kenshi during the events of Deadly Alliance, and joined the good side. He did not atack Ashrah, Ashrah attacked him mistakingly thinking that Ermac was a demon.
It was probably the soul of the One Being that was controlling Liu Kang. If it was Onaga, then they would not have said that he was being controlled by an "unknown force".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay
An Empty Shell
Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 2969
Location: United States
TMK Koins: 900755
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:37 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
Both are you forgetting that the Ermac-Ashrah conflict in Konquest took place when Ermac was still under Shao Kahn's control. This happenned a long time ago in MK history. This took place way before MK1. Currently Ermac is good good, but that wasn't until MKDA.
_________________
Very Angry Girls Instigate Negative Attitudes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All times are GMT | Page 4 of 4
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
| | |
