|
|
|
|
|
 |
VainZiler
True Fighting Fan
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 2645
Location: In front of a computer
TMK Koins: 777730
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:46 am
Post subject: |
 |
| |
| F1n1sh3r wrote: | | =Hey 1 Onaga does have fears you douche like say for instense he does not trust his new alliance im MKA and 2 Onaga's accually a RE-ENCARNATION of the TRUE dragon king but in Reptiles body How bout you play as sindel or jade In DEception to watch the movie when deafeating Onaga ,and by the way since he's not in his own body he's not the true heir to the thrown good day SIR! |
1. Trust and fear are two different things, read a dictionary some time
2. Onaga and Reptile no longer share bodies in MKAr, hence both of them are there
3. It's only in Sindels ending in MKD that shows this, in Jades it shows Tanya being mawled by Tarkatans, but that is asuming of course you actually played as Jade and Sindel, instead of making assinine assumptions
4.clearly someone hear doesnt know his MK mythology, and is trying to get big and bad with the keyboard.
5. He is in MKAr, so he is the true heir.
6. DarkSpector, you might want to watch your wording, telling people to take what the sages say with a grain of salt, can be taken offesnively by some of us, perhaps what you meant was, try to not take what they say as offensive, for they may not mean it to be mean.
_________________
| Amphibious wrote: | | As the great VainZiller said so long ago... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkSpecter
MORTAL KOMBAT
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 576
Location: Arizona
TMK Koins: 285
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:04 am
Post subject: |
|
| |
Yes Vain, thats exactly what i meant.  I edited my post to make that clear. Its a simple case of online misinterpretation of feelings through words like "damn" and etc. Or perhaps not. Anyways...
On topic, thanks for sharing that bit of info. Im still exploring those games (deception & armageddon).
_________________
MORTAL KOMBAT!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rainbird
TMK Visitor
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 38
TMK Koins: 249
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:25 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
|
For me it's raiden who ressurected liu and also before DA in Mk4 Tanya's ending she got Liu into a trap and shinnok kills him..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Man Himself:Rain
TMK Visitor
Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 41
Location: Somewhere taking over Outworld
TMK Koins: 260
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:43 am
Post subject: |
|
| |
[color=darkred][/color
Liu Kang was originally ressurected to be a tool of unspoken evil so I think, since he was ressurected in MK:D, Onaga. Only because of the evil part, I bet Onaga wanted Liu Kangs body as a servant to kill the good guys. But he must of freed his soul by accident and his soul was good. His soul was out to merge, or kill, the body.And sucseeded. 
_________________
Dont Make Me Laugh!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smiley98
Servant of pain
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
TMK Koins: 23020
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:55 am
Post subject: |
|
| |
| The Man Himself:Rain wrote: | [color=darkred][/color
Liu Kang was originally ressurected to be a tool of unspoken evil so I think, since he was ressurected in MK:D, Onaga. Only because of the evil part, I bet Onaga wanted Liu Kangs body as a servant to kill the good guys. But he must of freed his soul by accident and his soul was good. His soul was out to merge, or kill, the body.And sucseeded. |
Liu Kang was ressurected by Raiden. Just read his recently released bio:
http://mkarmageddon.com/assets/bios/bio_raiden.html
_________________
DEVELOPER DIARIES
Look at my other comics (on MK Pavilion) here:
http://tabmok99.mortalkombatonline.com/comic-smiley98.html
Feedback highly welcomed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F1n1sh3r
TMK Visitor
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 30
TMK Koins: 0
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:22 am
Post subject: Sorry |
|
| |
Sorry Dark Ive been off the board so long I was just alittle ticked
ok back to the discussion ok acualy NO1 brought back liu kang
throuh will the spirit of liu kang took his own body back so in it's selve liu brought himself back
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Simon
Demon Slayer
Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 1250
Location: Scotland
TMK Koins: 2147483147
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:34 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
It was Raiden who brought him back to kill people who threatened Earthrealm.
About Onaga, whether he is in Reptile's body or not, he was the true ruler of Outworld. Only Sindels ending in MKD had it that he actually was in reptile's body at one point he did appear very fast after the second last kamidogue wsas found so I would say that probably he did have his own body, Personally I don't even see why sindel was even in MKD when they missed out some much better characters.
_________________
"Why should people trust me? They don't have any reason to, yet. Distrust is human nature. Distrust creates doubt and doubt causes people to miss judge the intention of others. But people can change, can't they?"
"Time changes nothing, the world today is still filled with madness and rage."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spikeelliott
TMK Visitor
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 22
TMK Koins: 0
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:11 pm
Post subject: the elder gods |
|
| |
|
elder gods i thinks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doug
Mortal Kombat Is Back
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1118
Location: st-bruno,quebec,canada
TMK Koins: 2147482747
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
Spikeeliott please don't revive dead topics this one is 6 months old and is in the tmk rules to not do it. Thanks.
_________________
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amphibious
The Shadowy Usurper
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 2022
Location: Toronto, Canada
TMK Koins: 1010
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:32 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
Not to mention that 3 word posts like yours spikeelliott are considered SPAM on the board. Please give reasons for your choices or be more specific, or don't post at all. Doug and I aren't trying to be mean, we just want you to follow the board rules and help you learn them.
I would say if you really want to add your opinion to an old topic then it's okay to post in old ones, as long as it's not longer than 5 - 6 months since the last post. If you're going to add to it though, make sure it's a worth while post, not something short like you just did.
Since the topic is revived, I'd just like to add that it was Rayden who revived Liu Kang, as stated in Rayden's MK:AR biography which is now available.
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smiley98
Servant of pain
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
TMK Koins: 23020
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:33 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
| Amphibious wrote: | I would say if you really want to add your opinion to an old topic then it's okay to post in old ones, as long as it's not longer than 5 - 6 months since the last post. If you're going to add to it though, make sure it's a worth while post, not something short like you just did.
Since the topic is revived, I'd just like to add that it was Rayden who revived Liu Kang, as stated in Rayden's MK:AR biography which is now available. |
Even you?!? The last message was posted on 12th February. I think that some people (especially Sages who love the 6 months rule) should learn how to count months
_________________
DEVELOPER DIARIES
Look at my other comics (on MK Pavilion) here:
http://tabmok99.mortalkombatonline.com/comic-smiley98.html
Feedback highly welcomed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l{ombat_l{rave
TMK FanFic Kreator
Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 3869
Location: Behind you. Your other behind.
TMK Koins: 999999999
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:15 am
Post subject: |
|
| |
Man frowny, I noticed too but you didn't have to actually say it. That's just crude.
Nah, seriously. Ignoring the rule and applying common sense; the topic was dead either way. So with the inclusion of sanity, I'd consider it revived.
_________________
"...don't think it's yours just 'cause you marked it with your urine."
Ínformatíos sumus memorías æternus.
~Totus Moratlís Kertamen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smiley98
Servant of pain
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
TMK Koins: 23020
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:48 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
| l{ombat_l{rave wrote: | Man frowny, I noticed too but you didn't have to actually say it. That's just crude.
Nah, seriously. Ignoring the rule and applying common sense; the topic was dead either way. So with the inclusion of sanity, I'd consider it revived. |
Crude or not. I personally don´t like the 6 months rule, but I respect it.
If this would be the only case, then ok. But this was actually the third time some Sage claimed the topic was dead, though it wasn´t.
It becomes annoying that some people are finding broken rules where there are none. I think that these people should ´apply common sense´ and stop this behaviour. I can be a bitch too
I mean no offense, just trying to prevent some people from becoming paranoid 
And since this is heavily off topic, I´d consider our little sub discussion dead. Any smart remark? PM me about it, I´m waiting for it.
Have a Nice Day 
_________________
DEVELOPER DIARIES
Look at my other comics (on MK Pavilion) here:
http://tabmok99.mortalkombatonline.com/comic-smiley98.html
Feedback highly welcomed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amphibious
The Shadowy Usurper
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 2022
Location: Toronto, Canada
TMK Koins: 1010
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:12 am
Post subject: |
|
| |
Always the thorn in my funny bone, smiley. I believe however my math is correct in 6 months or less:
Last post was Feb. leaving
1.) March
2.) April
3.) May
4.) June
5.) JULY
I'd say there are some topics which are unique and rather than starting a new thread (as long as it hasn't been over 6 months and isn't far back in the board pages) then it's better to post in it again than make a brand new one, it's a bit silly really. Some people are constantly complaining about new threads with the same topics or titles, which is why I think revival (in some cases) is better than a whole new thread about something that's already been done.
I didn't claim this thread was dead, or I wouldn't have posted in it. I mentioned that the post was SPAM, which is was. Not to point fingers, but I like to have a clean record.
Now, to save someone else from the trouble, this thread has gotten way off topic and has only shown a splinter between what should be a unity of the Sage's. Let's try to prevent such things from occuring again. That's what the PM system is for, out discussion area, and IM programs.
Cheers,
-Amph
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smiley98
Servant of pain
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
TMK Koins: 23020
Items
|
| |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:25 pm
Post subject: |
|
| |
| Amphibious wrote: | Always the thorn in my funny bone, smiley. I believe however my math is correct in 6 months or less:
Last post was Feb. leaving
1.) March
2.) April
3.) May
4.) June
5.) JULY |
In fact Jul 09-Feb 12=4 moths and approximately 28 days. lol 
| Amphibious wrote: | | I'd say there are some topics which are unique and rather than starting a new thread (as long as it hasn't been over 6 months and isn't far back in the board pages) then it's better to post in it again than make a brand new one, it's a bit silly really. Some people are constantly complaining about new threads with the same topics or titles, which is why I think revival (in some cases) is better than a whole new thread about something that's already been done. |
Totally agreed. That´s why I said I don´t like the 6 months rule
| Amphibious wrote: | | I didn't claim this thread was dead, or I wouldn't have posted in it. I mentioned that the post was SPAM, which is was. Not to point fingers, but I like to have a clean record. |
I was most concerned with one person who said 3 times that topic is ´dead´ even though it was not. I can´t say that person´s name (because doug would be probably mad at me ). I was rather surprised that you didn´t check out the dates, but that´s ok now 
| Amphibious wrote: | | Now, to save someone else from the trouble, this thread has gotten way off topic and has only shown a splinter between what should be a unity of the Sage's. Let's try to prevent such things from occuring again. That's what the PM system is for, out discussion area, and IM programs. |
There may be unity between the Sages, but more important for me is that there should be the same rules for everyone (I know he spammed, but he really didn´t ´revive´ the topic and I wouldn´t like this to happen again, not pointed at you, my Amphibious friend ). That´s also the reason why I haven´t PMed the unnamed person and instead I´ve posted it here. When I think something´s wrong, I´ll say it out loud. Sorry. I´m not going to change anytime soon.
And if someone is really to be blamed for this off-topic discussion, then it´s really me, I have no problem with that.
Back on topic:
Do you think Liu Kang´s soul is mad at Raiden for ressurecting his body as zombie and using the body in order to fulfill Raiden´s dirty orders? 
_________________
DEVELOPER DIARIES
Look at my other comics (on MK Pavilion) here:
http://tabmok99.mortalkombatonline.com/comic-smiley98.html
Feedback highly welcomed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All times are GMT | Page 2 of 4
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
| | |
